Picking a cloud provider without the marketing noise
The differences that matter are quieter than the keynote slides.
The major cloud providers are more similar than their marketing suggests — compute, storage and networking are largely commodity at this point. The differences that actually matter for most teams are quieter: pricing structure for your specific usage pattern, the quality of the specific managed services you'll actually use, and how your team's existing skills map onto the provider's tooling.
Lock-in is real but often overstated
The bigger risk is usually the opposite of lock-in — avoiding a managed service to preserve theoretical portability, then spending months building and maintaining a worse version of the same thing yourself, for a portability requirement that may never actually materialize.
Match the provider to your team, not the reverse
The decision that tends to age well: pick based on what your team can operate confidently and what genuinely fits your workload's shape, not which provider had the best conference this year. Providers converge in capability faster than teams converge in expertise.
Pricing structure matters more than list price
Two providers can have similar headline pricing and wildly different actual costs for your specific workload, depending on data transfer charges, minimum billing increments, and which managed services you're actually using. Model your real usage pattern before comparing, not the marketing comparison chart.
- Core infrastructure is largely commodity across major providers — the differences are in the details.
- Avoiding managed services for theoretical portability often costs more than it saves.
- Pick what your team can operate confidently, not what had the best keynote.
The real price of "serverless" at scale
HAVE A PRODUCT IN MIND?
Tell us what you're building and where you need engineering support.